Why i will be believing that Anna Ardin is really a Liar 2020
I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 since the main-stream news have actually guaranteed really few individuals understand the information regarding the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought to never have now been arrested in britain to start with since there is no situation, and no investigation that is genuine. Look at this and also you will understand why.
One other thing perhaps perhaps perhaps not commonly grasped can there be isn’t any JURY in a rape test in Sweden which is a SECRET TEST. Every one of the proof, every one of the witnesses, are heard in secret. No public, no jury, no news. Truly the only part that is public the charging and also the verdict. There clearly was a judge and two advisers straight appointed by governmental events. And that means you never ever would get to comprehend just exactly how clearly the instance is just a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You can find therefore inconsistencies that are many Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps down I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:
Why did Anna Ardin perhaps maybe perhaps not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had sex with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood into the Swedish team around Assange for the shocking red cashmere sweater she had worn right in front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been about to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a buddy who was simply seeking Assange:
“He’s maybe not right right here. He’s planned to own intercourse because of the girl that is cashmere night, yet not managed to get. Possibly he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days earlier in the day, on 13 August, she was in fact intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she had been prepared to take to (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s life that is entire. She ended up being additionally to mention that this attack included enforced non-safe sex and she had been concerned with HIV.
If Ardin really thought that on 13 August Assange had forced non-safe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And exactly why ended up being Ardin speaking about with Assange his desire for sex with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact details as well as had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into a really brief survey associated with entire relationship that is ardin/Assange.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for a press seminar organised by a branch associated with the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she’s going to be away.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s supper with Assange and additionally they have actually consensual sex, in the very first day’s conference. Ardin afterwards alleges this changed into attack by surreptitious mutilation associated with the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to behave as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him from the dais at their press meeting. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a crayfish party, anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This try to look for a crayfish celebration fails, so Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early morning. Another provides to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless in the party that is crayfish Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting in the open xxxstreams.eu air at 02:00 and scarcely freezing with all the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, in accordance with both their authorities testimonies, rest once again in identical bed that is single and continue to do therefore for the following couple of days. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they just do not. That night, Anna and Julian get together to, and then leave together from, a supper with all the leadership of this Pirate Party. They again sleep when you look at the exact same sleep.
16 August: Julian would go to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin doesn’t warn her of prospective sexual attack. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say this woman is focused on STD’s including HIV after non-safe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, former colleague for a passing fancy ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist police, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply simply simply take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration Assange that is accusing of. Wilen does not want to signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had unsafe sex with her eight times formerly.
Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom into the authorities as proof; however a forensic examination finds no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged meeting with Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead to not grumble of a attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration alleging rape, that has been used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
Hence ordinary that certain of a couple of things occurred:
Ardin had been intimately assaulted with non-safe sex, but didn’t alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general general public and personal with him, work as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated proposes to accommodate him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after offering him making use of her one sleep flat while she ended up being away. By her very own admission, she had consensual intercourse with him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after non-safe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning friend that is feminist policewoman Irmeli Krans, to be able to twist Wilen’s story into a sexual assault – quite easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape guidelines. Wilen declined to signal.
In the authorities station on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did n’t need to place any costs against JA nevertheless the police wanted to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted that she ended up being “shocked once they arrested JA because we just desired him to have a test”.
The evening that is next 22.22 she texted “it ended up being the authorities whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then constructed her very own story of intimate attack. As numerous friends knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could maybe perhaps not claim non-consensual sex. Therefore she manufactured her story to fit in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event associated with torn condom. However the condom that is torn produced does not have any trace of Assange upon it. It really is impractical to wear a condom and never keep a DNA trace.
We have no trouble in stating that We securely think Ardin to become a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior which will be, when you look at the sense that is literal amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely weak, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever designed to see all this work detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place totally in secret. There’s absolutely no jury, as well as the national federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. If Assange visits Sweden, he can disappear completely into prison, the test are going to be key, plus the the next thing you’ll hear is the fact that he could be responsible and a rapist.
Next, needless to say, it doesn’t matter evidence is really poor, as merely to cry rape is always to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has succeeded in destroying most of the work and life of Assange. The facts associated with whole tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to consider the data. That she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami if you are not allowed to know who the accuser is, how can you find out?
Finally, to those of good use idiots whom declare that how you can test these issues is with in court, i might state needless to say, you might be appropriate, we must trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and we also should definitely condemn the behaviour that is disgraceful of whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.